3rd Part political runs in the Maritimes

I love this last guy purely on facial hair alone.
--------
Here's his political issue:

Another one (lumber):

More

2 comments:

David Raymond Amos said...

For the record Danny Boy you should have noticed by now that I made no comment whatsoever until you attacked me byway of qouting a very nasty Yankee from years ago. You should be clever enough to have noticed that I sent him the very same emails I sent you at the same time and he did not say a peep as you and I spat and chewed. Ask yourself why.

FYI I had a long talk with the Action Party dude you support on the phone before I encountered him on TV. He was a last minute replacement for the local Heritage Party boss who refused to make an appearance once he knew I was on the roster too. Of that I have no doubt.

The truly funny part of it all that night was the not so wise guy Stevey Boy Murphy and the redheaded dude Andy Cameron in Fat Fred City had no clue as to who I was until the camera was rolling live because all the media had gone to great lengths to keep me and my concerns secret.

Hell even the CBC ignored their mandate and would not acknowledge me as a candidate until the election was over in 2004 and would not do so again until deep in January of 2006 and only after I read the riot act to their lawyer Petey Boy Nollet in Ottawa.

Please notice i left your scool out of the fray once you backed off. I believe by now you have realized that I am a man of my word and not one bit the liar that Chucky Leblanc, Spinksy Baby and the "Blogger General" defintely are. they are in bed together. You must have noticed how fast Chucky deleted the blog about me once he realized he made a major Faux Pas and acknowledged that I had been banished from the LEG Correct?

Veritas Vincit

David Raymond Amos

David Raymond Amos said...

From: "Dan F." noreply-comment@blogger.com
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Me and Bush.
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com

Dan F. has left a new comment on the post "Me and Bush":

Amos,

I'll be honest with you - I don't have it in me to read through all
your stuff.

For those who want to hear your story, would you please write a
medium-long length blog with as much of the story as possible in it?

No pressure - best wishes.

Post a comment:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11475858&postID=111093368474666362&ext-ref=comm-sub-email

Unsubscribe to comments for this post:
http://www.blogger.com/comment-unsubscribe.g?blogID=11475858&postID=111093368474666362

Posted by Dan F. to Just Dave at Friday, May 09, 2008

Here ya go Danny Boy you are the first ordinary dude to get this email other than of course the self described janitor. I may explain why that is sometime. If you read his book you would understand why I speak and write in riddles. With people who know there is no need to say much.

Read it real slow then run with it if you wish as fast as you can.


HERE IS SOMETHING KINDA IMPORTANT ABOUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH THAT THE MEDIA NOR BYRON PRIOR WILL TALK ABOUT ON THE INTERNET

ASK YOURSELVES WHY IF YOU BOTHER TO READ IT THAT IS. IT IS RIGHT ON TOPIC ABOUT DIDDLERS ETC.

REST ASSURED I SAVED THIS WEB PAGE TO PROTECT MY PERSONAL FREEDOMS LETS SEE IF ANY OF YOU HAVE HALF A CLUE AS TO WHY IT IS ONLY ME THAT WILL TELL FOLKS OF SUCH AN IMPORTENT JUDGEMENT AS THIS OVER THE INTERNET

fEEL FREE TO QUOTE ME AND THE NEWSMAN WHO TRIED HARD TO CLAIM THAT HE DIDN'T KNOW SHIT AFTER WRITNG SUCH A CLOUDED REPORT OF THE JUDGEMENT THIS WEEK IN THE NEWFOUNLAND SUPREME COURT. MORE IMPORATANTLY WHY AIN'T BYRON PRIOR SAYING SHIT ABOUT IT EITHER. METHIKS SOMETHING STINKS ON THE ROCK. BUT WHAT DO I KNOW I AM JUST A MEAN DUMB RUDE OLD BIKE MECHANIC EH?

ONLY THE FOUR FELLAS THAT MET IN FAT FRED CITY TODAY COULD KNOW HOW BAD THINGS TRULY ARE IN THE MARITIMES. CORRECT? AS DEFEATISTS THEY MUST DISCUSS HOW TO LICK STEVEY BOY HARPER'S NASTY ARSE IN A FANCY FASHION AS THEY BEG FOR MORE MONEY BEFORE HIS MINORITY MANDATE FINALLY FOLDS ITS CIRCUS TENT ON THE HILL IN FARAWAY UPPER CANADA. DIDN'T DANNY MILLIOS SAY THAT HARPER CLAIMED HE DID NOT NEED THE THE ROCK(OR THE REST OF THE MARITIMES FOR THAT MATTER) IN ORDER TO SECURE THE MANDATE OF THE 40TH? LETS SEE IF THIS EMAIL CAN CHANGE THE SCENE.

FEEL FREE TO BLOG AWAY AS TO WHETHER I AM A LIAR OR NOT THE CORPORATE NEWSMEN DID NOT DISPUTE THE FACT THAT I OWN THIS EMAIL. I AIN'T SELLING IT. I AM GIVING IT AWAY. HAVE FUN BLOGGING THIS IF YOU ENJOY YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH HALF AS MUCH ASI DO.

I SWEAR IT IS ALL TRUE EVEN THOUGH BYRON PRIOR WON'T DO THE SAME. IF YOU READ THE JUDGEMENT YOU WILL SEETHAT NOBODY CAN SUE YOU OR PROSECUTE FOR WRITNG SOMETHING YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE. YOU ONLY CATCH 22 IS DO YOU TRULY BELIEVE ME?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: haneyt@gov.ns.ca, uarb.polcom@gov.ns.ca, william.corbett@elections.ca, dino.testa@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, helene.goulet@chrc-ccdp.ca, gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Cc: elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca, mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca, toby.fyfe@ocol-clo.gc.ca, ppritchard@fja.gc.ca, Marcel.Gibeault@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca, Rudin.Jemery@fin.gc.ca, Aida.Warah@ec.gc.ca, Jarvis.GE@forces.gc.ca, plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org, guy_chevalier@hc-sc.gc.ca, fortinma@dfo-mpo.gc.ca, smcdonel@justice.gc.ca, LKOIV@psc-cfp.gc.ca, JohnstonS@ainc-inac.gc.ca, sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 at 4:36 PM
Subject: FW: RE: Telegram article Thank you Jackie

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: haneyt@gov.ns.ca; uarb.polcom@gov.ns.ca
Cc: Casey.B@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 4:30 PM
Subject: For the record Haney your office has had these emails for years and you refused to call me back long ago

You as Police Commisioner should be also well aware of what happened
between the Cape Breton Police Force, at least two MPs and I last
January. They all received these emails and I did receive many
responses and false allegations since then Correct?

Unlike you I do my home work and I never play dumb. Thats your forte
not mine. Politics got you your fancy jobs. Of that I have no doubt. Our conversation today was just malicious politicking that you were practicing on behalf of Cecil Clarke and his malicious assistant MacDonald CORRECT?

For the record if some nasty bastard hollers at me I holler back like any proper Maritimer with any balls should. My father taught me that and the ghost of the Old Lady From Hell who was one of my best friends agrees. That is why he gave me his kilt. My father's ghost would be the first to tell any military dude that his wild but ethical child don't take orders from anyone and is fierce as hell without ever losing his temper. I ain't in your god damned army and I hate those who prompt WAR. Were peacekeepers my whole life and your new hero Petey Baby MacKay is the latest Minister of DEFENCE NOT ATTACK that is why I wish to run against him in the election of the 40th Parlaiment whilst suing Her Magesty the Queen.

Also for the record my father named me after his friend David Hornell(a military man should know who he was) and my mother named me after her favorite brother both men died so that nasty bastards such as yourself should not support the efforts of men in black who come at night and try take decent man away in front of their children just because he had proven that he had the evidence to impeach a Yankee President BEFORE the War in Iraq started. GET IT YET? Ask your boss the latest Attorney General to show you the hard copy of my material that has been in his office since August of 2005 before you dare to call me a liar SIR.

Nonsense such as hollering etc don't work out to well with me EH? I immediately raise the stakes and set up the nasty bastard for a
lawsuit. Perhaps you should contact you friends in the Police
Commission in Fredeicton or the lawyer Paul Kenendy of the Public
complaints Against Against the RCMP and ask them to forward to you
hard copy of my material so you can have lawyers check my work more thoroughly if Cecil Clarke and his cohorts won't tell you shit. Perhaps Nova Scotia should have a lawyer call me now EH Arsehole? I waited until I got a response from the Halifax PD requesting my material before I pounced on you once again. I will lays odd that you had a lawyer listening in on our converstion that is why you would not introduce me. CORRECT?

For the Record I just sent you and your buddies in Halifax PD and some
of their buddies evidence of murder once again. The Canadian Criminal Code is still in effect in Nova Scotia. Correct? Say Hoka Hey to the RCMP for me will ya? I will look forward to meeting you all in court and then once again in hell someday if there truly is such a place.

Can ya tell ya pissed off the Wrong Maritimer Mr. Haney? You picked this fight not me. Say Hoka Hey to my MP Billy Casey for me will ya? He has had Hard copy for wway past too long too and the recent ghost of far too many honourable Canadian soldiers are haunting me as they should you.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Rest Assured we will be disputing this and the following emails in
court someday or my name ain't "Just Dave" As I watched somebody studying my words yesterday on the web I called the Halifax PD many times and nobody would talk to me or call back so I called you. A Police Commissioner can Play Dumb but at least computers don't bullshit.

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 4,276
Domain Name aliant.net ? (Network)
IP Address 142.68.66.# (Aliant Telecom)
ISP Aliant Telecom
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Nova Scotia
City : Halifax
Lat/Long : 44.65, -63.6 (Map)
Language English (Canada)
en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit May 8 2008 2:51:23 pm
Last Page View May 8 2008 3:19:47 pm
Visit Length 28 minutes 24 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...per-and-bankers.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...per-and-bankers.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time May 8 2008 2:51:23 pm
Visit Number 4,276

http://www.capebretonu.ca/ICEMS/People.asp

Thomas P. Haney – SBStJ, CD, BA, cdse, pcsc, plsc

Tom Haney took up his appointment as the Director, Nova Scotia Police
Complaints Commission on 21 August 2006.

Prior to this, he was the Director of the Police Leadership Program at
Dalhousie University, the CEO of Commissionaires of Nova Scotia and
CEO of the Nova Scotia Safety Council.

Tom has worked as a consultant in policy and democracy matters in
Jamaica, Ukraine and for the Iraqi Electoral Commission as well as an
advisor with the Haitian National Police. All of this followed a
career as a Military Police officer which spanned nearly 30 years and included service in Canada, Germany, United Kingdom, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Somalia and Qatar.

He holds a BA from St. Mary's University and is a graduate of the
Executive Development Course of the Canadian Police College as well as the Canadian Forces Staff College. He lives in Chester, Nova Scotia with his wife Lynden and has three children.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 15:52:44 -0300
Subject: Re: Your email regarding Mr Neil Leblanc and KPMG
To: Frank Chambers chambef@halifax.ca

KINDA LATE AREN'T YA. WHY DON'T YOU PEOPLE PICK UP THE PHONE?

On 5/9/08, Frank Chambers chambef@halifax.ca wrote:

Dear Mr Amos,

I am in receipt of your messages sent to Halifax Regional Police staff regarding the above subjects.

It is unclear what your specific allegations or complaints concern. Could you please respond to me by email outlining the specifics of your allegations and/or your specific request of the
Halifax Regional Police.

Respectfully yours

Frank Chambers, D/Sgt
Integrated Special Investigation Section
Halifax Regional Police

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: telegram@thetelegram.com
Cc: pwalsh@thetelegram.com; letters@thetelegram.com
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: Telegram article Thank you Jackie

I will call Peter Walsh shortly if he does not call me first I am at
506 756 8687 right now.

To give Paul a heads up perhaps he should study the words of an affadavit mentioning Byron Prior and I over three years ago in the matter he was referring to within his article. Obviously this document was filed well over three years ago in the Supreme Court. This is a hell of a scoop and I am the only person who will be willing to give him the related documentation. I hope he is paying attention because I am revealing many awful truths in several blogs right now. I have inserted the text of those words at the bottom of this email you sent to me.

As I told you on the phone I needed to read what you sent first before I talked to anyone about the judgement because the Byron Prior story about the recent judgement is not on the Internet anywhere. Even Byron Prior and the CBC are silent for reasons of lucre and malice. Of that I have no doubt.

I commend the Telegram for at least reporting something about it finally because there is another important criminal matter about to be addressed next week that I should be called as a witness to testify to. The CBC reported about the matter nearly years ago and has played as dumb as a post about it ever since even though it is all over the Interent anyway and Paul Perrier was maliciously prosecuted first and his bail bond agreement violates his rights under the Charter and no lawyer hired by the Crown or in private practice will even begin to discuss my concerns about the severe lack of integrity of their chosen profession. That is a very simple irrefuttable fact which I have proven many times in many courts and elsewhere as well.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/02/spoof-emails.html

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html

http://priorjustice.blogspot.com/2006/08/paul-perrier-charged-with-mischief-for.html

I own my words but in return I for your being very nice to me Jackie, I will tell you that the Telegram or anyone else can research some of my files for free byway of the Internet. A good place to start would be the following link. Rest assured I will upload more files about many things when time permits and more importantly when it is politcally correct to do so. I was surprised that you had not heard of me. Lets just say I am much considered to be a "Persona Non Grata" so to speak. However I am very much for real. Ask Danny Millions if I am a liar or not after you read the document in following link.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2895811/Newfy-Governor

For the record while the CTV W-FIVE outfit was discussing my matters in the USA with me six years ago your news organization had true copies of my first two law suits with the attached exhibits in their hands. The documents were served upon their now defunct Daily News outfit in Halifax. It was done in hand in November of 2002 by my daughter and I and I beleive I still have the potographs to prove it. I have discussed my concerns about the lack of integrity of your publicly held company and its journalists with its General Counsel a very long time ago and in return the nasty lawyers laughed at me. If you doubt me just type the name of AJ Walling or some of former reporter associates of the Daily News and my name as well and see what you find on the Internet. Your people have been inviting me to sue them for years as I shook my head at their obvious malice. Have a look in the Gypsy's blog.

http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/daily-news-people-descend-on-nb.html

However just because your company's lawyers and Byron Prior are not nice it does not follow that all folks that work for the company are that way. Today Jackie you and the friend in Newfoundland who informed me of the news in your paper in Newfoundland has helped to renew my faith in mankind a little bit. For that I truly thank you. Maybe now my little Clan can finally see a little Justice served on their behalf. It has been three long lonely years without them under my wing. It is very hard for a father to protect his children from afar and absolutely impossible to hug and kiss them good night.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Telegram telegram@thetelegram.com
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 12:42:55 -0230
Subject: Telegram article
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Hello David:

Pasted below is the article you were looking for. We generally charge for research services, but this one is on the house.

Jackie
Editorial Clerk


The Telegram (St. John's)
Provincial, Tuesday, May 6, 2008, p. A4

Justice/Free Speech
Truth matters
Defamation law that ignores truth ruled unconstitutional

Peter Walsh

The Supreme Court of Newfoundland has ruled a law that could send someone to prison for defamation is unconstitutional.

Justice Lois Hoegg made the decision Friday. Her ruling also struck down a criminal case by Crown prosecutors against Byron Prior of Grand Bank.

Prior claims that in 1966, a justice official in the province raped and impregnated one of his relatives. Crown attorneys say Prior wore placards and distributed flyers which published the allegations.

The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary interviewed Prior's relative in 2004 and in 2007, but the alleged victim denied she had been sexually assaulted or that she even knew the person Prior said had attacked her.

Crown prosecutors tried to convict Prior of defamation under Section 301 of the Criminal Code, which says "everyone who publishes a defamatory libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding two years."

The problem is, Hoegg said, the Crown couldn't prove that Prior was
knowingly spreading lies.

"I find that it is not justified, in our free and democratic society, for the Crown to use the heavy hammer of the criminal law against a subject for publishing defamatory libel when the Crown is not able to show that the subject knows that his statements are false.

"The expression of truthful, unpopular or even false statements deserve protection unless expressed in a violent manner," wrote Hoegg.

Hoegg said if the Crown could prove Prior knowingly published defamatory libel, it would have charged him under a different section of the criminal code that says "everyone who publishes a defamatory libel that he knows is
false is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years."

That law has withheld court challenges. Section 301 - the law which does not mention the matter of truth - has been struck down as unconstitutional by three other superior courts in Canada.

"The sections catch different types of offender. To me, it naturally follows that their purpose or objectives must be different," wrote Hoegg. "I then
determined that the objective (of Section 301) was not so pressing and important as to override freedom of expression. The section is offensive to modern day notions of justice."

The decision only applies to criminal applications of defamation law. Hoegg said Prior could possibly be sued in civil court over his allegations.

Three years ago, a federal politician filed a statement of claim in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador to have a website that contained
allegations about him by Prior removed. In the statement, the politician said a website posted by Prior accuses him and other prominent Newfoundlanders of wrongdoing.

A website containing the allegations is still active. Prior claims to be a victim of physical and sexual abuse.

pwalsh@thetelegram.com

709-364-2323


2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:

WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT

Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010

Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005

Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May

Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order
restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
proceeding to case management.

Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
management.

A F F I D A V I T

I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as follows:

THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.

THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.

THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my Affidavit.

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit "2".

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.

THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author of the material on the site.

THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews' intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4" to this Affidavit.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.

THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.

THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews' claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach as Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.

THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior's counterclaim.

SWORN to before me at
St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of January, 2005.

Signed by Della Hart
STEPHEN J. MAY
Signature STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires on December 31, 2009